Following the NFL draft, [I] noted that the NFL's advisory committee, which gives underclassmen an estimate of where they will be drafted, and draftnik commentary in general, both overstate a player's odds of being drafted high, or drafted at all. I cited examples of football players who had been enticed by such overestimates to give up their senior years because they expected to be drafted high, then were drafted low or not drafted at all.
The same tendency to overestimate draft chances is drawing underclassman basketball players out of college. In the run-up to the NBA draft, ESPN.com's Insider ranked the top 100 prospects and estimated their draft slots. The estimates had 19 players going in the lottery (where there are 14 positions), 44 players going in the first round (there are 30 choices) and 69 players going in the 30 choices of the second round (that adds up to more than 100 owing to some players listed as likely to go in the "late first to early second" round). Many basketball touts and hangers-on were urging players on the bubble to jump out of college, in part by overestimating their draft prospects. Jump early and become a star, like Kobe Bryant, and you maximize your lifetime earnings. Jump early and struggle -- like the majority of those who jump early to the NBA -- and you cost yourself millions of dollars.
Underclassman basketball players ranked by touts as likely to be drafted in the first round, including Mario Chalmers, DeAndre Jordan and Chris Douglas-Roberts, gave up the rest of their college experience only to last until the second round. After the draft, John Denton of ESPN.com wrote, "Chalmers, the Final Four's Most Outstanding Player and a hero for hitting the clutch 3-pointer that forced overtime, looked on in disbelief on draft night as the first round came and went without his name being announced ... Douglas-Roberts ... has fumed about his horrifying draft experience." I attended the Final Four, and while watching CDR, I thought, "He is a potential star but there is no way he's ready." Egged on by overstated estimates, CDR left college and declared for the draft, only to discover the NBA consensus was that he should have stayed in school.
JaVale McGee left college as a sophomore but after playing for only one year -- he did not start as a freshman, and was not dominant when he did play as a soph. Perhaps he believed projections of himself as a lottery pick; instead McGee went 18th overall, to Washington. Had he stayed in college longer and become a great player, plus well-known, fans would be saying, "Wow, the Wizards got JaVale McGee!" Instead fans are saying, "Who is JaVale McGee?" Because McGee jumped too soon, the odds are he will have a hard climb to be more than an NBA backup, because at the pro level, he's not going to get the minutes he needs to improve his game. In turn, he will have a nice income in the next two years, versus no income had he remained in college. But his lifetime income will likely drop way down because he may never advance to a mega-contract. Jordan was a particularly sad case because he jumped after his freshman year, expecting to go in the first round. Had he stayed in school he had an excellent chance of reaching the high first round and substantially increasing his lifetime earnings. Instead, he went in the second round, will struggle to get minutes, and is now much more likely to have a minimum-scale NBA career than ever advance to a mega-contract. Jumping early may have reduced his lifetime sports earnings by tens of millions of dollars.
Will current college basketball players learn the lesson of overestimation of draft status? Already ESPN Insider is listing the top 100 prospects for the 2009 NBA draft. Seventeen are listed as going in the 14 lottery positions, 56 in the 30 positions of the first round and 71 in the 40 possible positions of first round to early second round. There may be many cases where the universe of basketball agents, gossip Web sites and AAU hangers-on is overestimating the chances that underclassmen will be first-round NBA draft choices if they declare early. Most of these underclassmen will be better off -- and have higher career earnings -- if they stay in school.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Stay in School, Earn More
The astute, though sometimes lascivious, Gregg Easterbrook writes the following about college basketball players leaving school early to go pro:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Chalmers is at least starting (tonight). CDR, Rush, Arthur, etc are all riding the bench when they could have been livin' the dream one more year on campus.
I disagree with some of what the writer expresses. I understand that being mislead is a problem and having a kid think he is going in the 1st round only to fall into the second round is horrible. However; in basketball unlike baseball or football drafts the rookies are slotted money wise based on their draft status. Therefore, if you are selected middle to late of the first round you are not getting a huge contract initially, yet 1 million dollars is more than they would be making in college. To further my point if you were to leave after your freshman year and get selected outside of the lottery but, you receive a million per year contract and you sit for the first year, contribute the second, and start in your third year (your senior year in college) and assuming you made only 1 million per year over that time and you invest that money you are set for along time. The kicker is that you have earned 3 million while you would have been in college and based on the time value of money and how much quicker you would reach free agency and your next contract which is always bigger, you are better off leaving early if you are willing to work hard and become a player in the NBA. Not to mention that you could get hurt in college and never have a chance.
Lets be honest if Chalmers would have stayed he would have been the only offensive option for KU which either could have increased his stock and hurt it. He wouldn't have left on a higher note then hitting that big shot in the tournament unless he averaged some huge numbers and with Self's system that wouldn't have happened anyway.
Chad
Post a Comment